Architects for Peace news and articles

11.12.16

El pillaje del patrimonio cultural Palestino

By Sergio Yahni  
(This article was first published in Sergio Yahni's blog in October 31, 2016 and has been republished with the permission of its author. Find an English version of this article here.)

Maqueta del edificio del “Campus Nacional de Arqueología” que albergara las oficinas de la Autoridad de Antigüedades, almacenes que darán cabida a dos millones de artículos, laboratorios, una biblioteca y un magnífico espacios de exposición (fotografía: Israel Archeological Authority).
"The construction of Israel’s National Archaeology Campus (NAC), designed by architects Moshe Safdie and Irit Kohavi, has slowly but steadily progressed since 2012. NAC will sit next to the Israel Museum and Bible Lands Museum in central West Jerusalem, on what Israelis call “Museum Hill.” The $104 million building spans 35,000 square meters and stands nine floors tall. Inside will be the offices of Israel Antiquities Authorities, storage for two million artifacts, laboratories, a library, as well as exhibition spaces." Find an English version of this article here.

La construcción de un nuevo “Campus Nacional de Arqueología” diseñado por los arquitectos Irit Kohavi y Moshe Safdie todavía esta en curso y continuará por al menos otros 14 meses. La idea de construir este campus, que se encuentra en las cercanías del Museo de Israel y el Museo de la Biblia, surgió tras los Acuerdos de Oslo con el objetivo de transferir las colecciones del Museo Rockefeller de arqueología, situado en Jerusalén Oriental.

Se trata de un proyecto que no ha tenido un impacto internacional pero que claramente contradice convenios internacionales que tienen como objetivo prevenir el saqueo de la riqueza cultural de una región ocupada militarmente.

El museo Rockefeller de arqueología fue establecido durante el Mandato Británico de Palestina Contiene una gran colección de piezas arqueológicas desenterradas en las excavaciones llevadas a cabo entre los años 1920 y 1967.

Este museo se estableció como parte de una política británica de exponer en sus países de origen hallazgos arqueológicos que se consideraban parte del patrimonio nacional. Anteriormente esto hallazgos hubieran sido “exportados” a la metrópolis.

Esta idea ya se había llevado a la práctica en otras colonias del Imperio Británico donde se abrían centros dedicados a la actividad arqueológica que incluían oficinas para el Departamento de Antigüedades, salas de almacenamiento y un museo para exponer las piezas.

Interior del Museo Rockefeller en Jerusalén Oriental. El edificio
construido por por Austen Harrison fue iniciativa del Mandato Británico
de Palestina con el objetivo de crear un patrimonio nacional arqueológico
del país (fotografía: Wikipedia).
El museo adquirió su nombre cuando en 1925 John D. Rockefeller Jr. accedió a donar dos millones de dólares para el proyecto a pedido de James Henry Breasted, fundador y director del Instituto Oriental de la Universidad de Chicago.

Tras los acuerdos de cese de fuego jordano-israelíes de 1949 el museo Rockefeller paso a poder del Reino de Jordania. 39 años mas tarde, en Julio del 1988, cuando el gobierno jordano rescindió de sus demandas territoriales en Cisjordania este tendría que convertirse en parte del patrimonio cultural del Estado Palestino y por lo tanto estaría protegido por convenios internacionales de los cuales Israel es parte.

Como parte de un territorio ocupado esta riqueza cultural debería estar protegida por los Convenios de Ginebra, la Convención de La Haya para la Protección de los Bienes Culturales en caso de Conflicto Armado, por Convención sobre las Medidas que Deben Adoptarse para Prohibir e Impedir la Importación, la Exportación y la Transferencia de Propiedad Ilícitas de Bienes Culturales y otros convenios internacionales que tienen como objetive evitar el pillaje de bienes culturales durante conflictos armados o en situaciones de ocupación militar.

Pero tras la ocupación de la ciudad en 1967 y su anexión en 1980 Israel ignoro estas múltiples protecciones transfiriendo la administración del museo y sus colecciones a la Autoridad de Antigüedades de Israel transformándolo en una institución israelí mas.

La construcción del “Campus Nacional de Arqueología” Israel forma parte de un proceso de vaciamiento de los valores culturales de Jerusalén oriental que desde la ocupación fueron confiscados, clausurados, o que simplemente se dejaron decaer en desuso.

El nuevo predio en construcción sera un edificio de 35 mil metros cuadrados que se extenderá en nueve plantas y costada 400 Millones de dólares norteamericanos. Este edificio albergara las oficinas de la Autoridad de Antigüedades, almacenes que darán cabida a dos millones de artículos, laboratorios, una biblioteca y un magnífico espacios de exposición.

Hava Katz, doctora en arqueología y conservadora jefe de las exposiciones, ha dicho al periódico Haaretz que el cielo raso de la plaza de entrada tendrá un número de mosaicos bizantinos “que estaban en edificios o espacios públicos y parte de ellos serán expuestos por primera vez”. Uno de estos los mosaicos, que se encontraba en las bodegas del Museo Rockefeller cubría el cielo raso de en una capilla bizantina Beit She’an que fue excavada durante el Mandato Británico por el arqueólogo Michael Avi-Yonah. Katz cuenta que este mosaico trae imágenes de la vendimia, de animales de pastoreo y de caza. Dentro del edificio habrá un espacio de exposiciones con techo transparente.

Sin duda el nuevo “Campus Nacional de Arqueología” es un proyecto ambicioso pero no es seguro que pueda competir con una joya arquitectónica tal como es el edificio del Museo Rockfeller, que fue diseñado por Austen Harrison. Por otro lado, este proyecto, que no fue detectado por el radar de la UNESCO representa un peligro mas a las riquezas culturales palestinas y confirma la “necesidad urgente de llevar a cabo la misión de monitoreo reactivo” por parte de la institución internacional.

31.12.11

Remember those who live without peace and whose homes and land have been occupied

And, at this time of the year when we celebrate home, family, friendship and peace, it is important to remember those who live without peace and whose homes and land have been occupied. To them, to us, with hope for a more peaceful and just future.

11.8.09

Defending Bedouin houses from being demolished in the Hebron region

“I don’t consider my work political,” he said between phone calls as he drove. “I don’t have a solution to this dispute. I just know that what is going on here is wrong. This is not about ideology. It is about decency.” NYT, 27 June, 2009.
Ezra Nawi is an Israeli human rights activists who was arrested trying to
defend Bedouin houses from being demolished in the Hebron region. His trial
comes up next week, and Jewish Voice for Peace is collecting signatures to
support his release.
Abe Hayeem (Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine, APJP)

Support Ezra Nawi
Sign a petition: Jewish Voice for Peace
Find more: "Unlikely Ally for Residents of West Bank". NYT, 27 June, 2009.

2.6.09

Eyal Weizman interview: Israel's oppressive architecture of occupation


Dissident architect Eyal Weizman explains the mechanics of Israel’s occupation of Palestine to Anindya Bhattacharyya

29.11.07

Petition against the Demolition of Fasayil School in Palestine

Architects for Peace and Unesco Observatory are signatories and support of the campaign to save Fasayil primary School in Palestine.
Image source here


URGENT CALL
Palestinian Primary School in Fasayil to be demolished on the 29th of November!

Education not Occupation


Stop the Occupation from destroying yet another community project aimed atbuilding a future for PalestiniansThis summer, the Popular Committee of Fasayil together with the Palestinian Save the Jordan Valley Initiative of the Anti-Apartheid Wall Campaign and the Brighton Tubas Friendship and Solidarity Group, started to build the first and only primary school in Fasayil in the heart of the Jordan Valley. The grassroot project is part of the twinning between community groups in Brighton and in Palestine.

In defiance of the Israeli occupation’s complete ban on house construction, the shell of the new school has been completed in September. The school was built out of traditional mud bricks, using traditional building techniques and will provide a resource for more than 115 children. It aims at resolving the grave educational crisis that is affecting Fasayil and many other communities in the Jordan Valley caused by military restrictions imposed by the Israeli occupation forces.

Education is a crucial tool for empowering Palestinian children to confront the harsh life under occupation, opening a perspective that goes beyond a future as slave labourers in the occupation’s settlement plantations.

On Thursday, the 17th of October, however, the so-called ‘Military Civil Administration’ issued an injuction on the building of the school as well as yet another Palestinian family’s home in the village. Construction work requires a permit from the occupation authorities, but since the occupation of the West Bank in 1967, not one has been granted. The systematic ban on construction is clearly aimed at driving Palestinians out of the Jordan Valley. This ban is part a systematic policy of ethnic cleansing by the Israeli state.

According to the injunction issued against the primary school, the community has to apply for a permit by 29th November. Permits are never issued in Fasayil as the land is designated as ‘agricultural’ by the Israeli authorites. The military could demolish the school soon after the 29th.But villagers and local activists are defiant:

“They can knock our school down as often as they want. We cannot stop them from doing so. We will build the school again and again and again. They cannot destroy our determination to give proper education to our children.”

“Our children’s education is our future! They will not succeed in their attempts
to drive us from our land.”

We are calling on all free-minded people around the world, the media and the international community to get active to prevent the Israeli occupation forces from destroying Fasayil’s primary school!


Defend the children’s right to education!



Sign the petition: here. If you are an arch-peace member or arch-peace friend please consider signing: your name, Architects for Peace.

Find more: Brighton-Tubas Solidaritiy Group

See images of Fasayil' school construction process: here

Permission for republishing this article has been granted by the Brighton-Tubas Solidaritiy Group


26.11.06

Israel issues last permits to foreigners

Israel issues last permits to foreigners, splitting familiesPress Release, Campaign for the Right of Entry/Re-Entry to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 22 November 2006
All foreign passports of spouses and children of Palestinian ID-holders who had applied for visa extensions were marked recently as "last permit" by the Israeli authorities. 105 passport holders are required to exit from Israeli controlled entry/exit points before the end of the year. The Israeli Ministry of Interior (MoI) office at Beit El began returning the passports on November 19 after a six-week strike by Israeli MoI employees. Those who overstay their allotted time will be considered "illegal" and are subject to immediate deportation from the Israeli occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). In an effort to avoid being considered "illegal" and threatened with arrest by the Israelis, some families are opting to relocate abroad. The pattern of refusing visa renewals for family members is part of an overall Israeli effort that denies entry to foreign nationals seeking access to the oPt.


The impact of Israel's practice includes the forced separation of spouses from each other, parents from their children, educators and students from their schools, healthcare, NGO and humanitarian workers from access to needy communities, and business owners from their investments. According to the PA MoI, hundreds of applications for Israeli visa extensions following Israeli guidelines were submitted in October and are still pending. Also, Israel is refusing to process an estimated 120,000 family unification residency applications. Every denial of entry and visa renewal refusal impacts an estimated 10 people, many of whom subsequently resort to moving to another country. "This is a silent ethnic cleansing," said Basil Ayish, a spokesperson from the Campaign for the Right of Entry/Re-Entry to the oPt.


Despite official complaints by foreign governments of discrimination against their citizens by Israel, Israel continues to disregard its obligations under international law and agreements and persists in its practice of changing the demographics within the oPt. The U.S. State Department, EU, and at least one Latin American country have all submitted demarches to Israeli officials since October. Foreigners wishing to reside in, visit or work in the oPt continue to be banned at Israeli-controlled ports of entry.


Because Israel refuses to permit non-Jewish foreigners from receiving residency status in the oPt, the only mechanism for foreign passport-holding spouses and children of Palestinian ID-holders to join their families has been to rely on a system of continuously renewable 1, 2, or 3-month 'visitor' permits. This practice was widely expected to be a transitory measure until mechanisms were put in place to provide permanent residency status for non-ID holding family members. Some family members have been following this procedure for more than 30 years as the only option open to them.


source:electronic intifada

13.9.06

Petition: 10th international architecture biennale Venice

Note: This petition has been organised and written by our colleagues from Architects & Planners for Justice in Palestine www.apjp.org and it is reproduced with their permission.
Please click here to add your names to this petition.


PETITION TO THE ORGANIZERS 10th INTERNATIONAL ARCHITECTURE BIENNALE VENICE - SEPTEMBER 2006
We are writing to express our dismay and concern that the Venice Biennale has agreed to host the Israeli contribution to the exhibition on the Architecture of Commemoration.

The whole contribution, funded by the Israeli Government, totally excludes the Palestinians who are the target and real victims of the seemingly unending series of wars being memorialised, and awards Israel the sole position of victim and victor. The contributor Dan Daor says that the message of memorial structures is that "there are no heroes - all there is, is the eternity of Israel, all of the country is on the front, and all of us are victims."


There are no memorials in Israel to the Nakba, the Palestinian tragedy of displacement and dispossession, where the intention of transfer and exclusion led to the destruction and elimination of 580 Palestinian villages towns and cities. Even today, this dispossession and humiliation goes on in Gaza and the West Bank, with the destruction of their heritage in the historic cities of Jerusalem, Nablus, Hebron, Bethlehem and Jericho.

This is particularly ironic when the subject of the Biennale is architecture, cities and society.The architectural critic for Haaretz, Esther Zandberg has described this exhibition as "an extreme example of architectural symbolism and manipulation, in which the profession is called upon to shape consciousness to specific needs. At times, architecture even exploits the viewers' lack of defence, leading him or her, through its unique devices to the seemingly essential conclusion that was outlined in advance." Thus the eminent Israeli architects represented here are being used as tools of Israeli propaganda, and consequently would be deemed to be complicit in the agenda of excluding the Palestinian narrative. Significantly, the Israeli organisation Zochrot which deals with remembering the Nakba has been omitted from this exhibition.

In the words of the Israeli curator Tula Amir: "Justification of Israel's wars provides legitimisation of the blood that has been spilled and is liable to be spilled in the future, of the continued unreserved co-operation between the military and security establishment and the citizens of the country, and of the undisputed consensus according to which struggle is the instrument of survival of our existence in Israel." But it has been evident that the wars and tragedies engulfing Palestine/Israel since 1948 have been due to Israel's intransigence and refusal to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the conflict. We request that the Biennale Committee consider withdrawing the Israeli entry as being provocative and counterproductive to the aims of the Biennale, and particularly distasteful in the context of the aftermath of an ugly and unnecessary war in neighbouring Lebanon, and a continuing one-sided war in Gaza.

Whatever you do about the Israeli participation, we would like the organisers to consider asking for a Palestinian contribution, highlighting the historic and ongoing displacement of the Palestinian people.

Please click here to add your names to our petition.

ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS FOR JUSTICE IN PALESTINE

Ted Cullinan, Charles Jencks, Louis Hellman, Ian Martin, Jake Brown, Hans Haenlein, Abe Hayeem, Antoine Raffoul, Haifa Hammami, Eitan Bronstein (Zochrot), Mike Macrae, Neil Lambert, Steve Fox, John Waller, Michael Safier, Phil Gusack, Malkit Shoshan (FAST), Martin O’Shea, Dr. Jim Berrow, John Murray, Paul Barham, Maria Jones, Mahmoud Zeena, Marco Capra, Osama Hamdan, Federico Malasardi, Claude Martel, Mustafa Chaudhary John Hodge, Beatriz C. Maturana, Daniella Bellelli, Christian Drinkwater, Kate Mackintosh, Stefano Ferrari



'All of Israel is the front, and we are all victims'
By Esther Zandberg

The exhibition "Life Saver: Typology of Commemoration in Israel," which represents Israel this year at the 10th International Architecture Biennale in Venice, focuses on architecture of commemoration and memory, which is conceivably the most charged and sensitive subject in the field. This is particularly true in Israel, which regrettably enjoys great expertise on the subject.

Israel is the record holder for such sites, as commemoration is a primary component of the national ethos. The number of commemoration sites and memorials in Israel is considered the highest per-capita in the world. Now, new subjects for commemoration - the victims of the second Lebanon war - have been added to the circle.

The exhibition, which opens on September 10 and closes November 19, was curated by architect Tula Amir, and will be exhibited in the Israeli pavilion of the Biennale at the Castello Giardini in Venice. The timing, before the echoes of the war even had a chance to die down, could not have been more symbolic or macabre. On the face of it, the timing is coincidental. But the subject was already chosen a year ago, and the concept was agreed upon and crystallized well before the war began. This said, commemoration and memory are never coincidental in Israel; they are actual and relevant at any given time.
The exhibition itself makes no reference to the current war, another link in the vicious cycle of bereavement-commemoration-memory. Isn't it a given that this war should be referred to in an exhibition that deals with commemoration and memory? "The war is still fresh," says Amir. "It isn't possible to understand or assess this latest rupture, not socially. And of course not in terms of the architecture of commemoration. This is the first war in which I am the same age as the parents, a fact that adds a new layer to the pain and confusion and fear."

Manipulation of consciousness

The exhibition presents 15 commemoration and memorial structures that have been built throughout Israel in the 57 years between 1949 and 2006. Most of them have become architectural and cultural icons, compulsory stops for many Israelis and tourists alike. They have become a constituent element of the Israeli architectural 'export,' and are representative of the uniqueness of the commemoration phenomenon in Israel. As Amir puts it, this architecture is primarily based on the idea of "the double view": looking back at death, and looking ahead to the future; somewhere in the middle is the commemoration structure, which seeks to "exalt death and justify the cost."

The double view, explains Amir, is the common denominator linking most commemoration structures in Israel - despite different architectural styles and changes that have taken place in memorial patterns over the years. This double view is represented in the memorial structures through a series of architectural contrasts: dark and light, open and closed, above and below, near and far. Nearly all of the commemoration structures, she notes, exploit more than one of these contrasts, providing the spectator with a sort of corrective experience.

At times, the double view in memorial sites is created by positioning the inanimate architectural-sculptural object in front of a landscape, or against a background of vegetation, "which symbolizes life, growth and continuation," notes Amir. Numerous commemoration structures incorporate or guide the visitor to a viewing spot from which he or she is exposed to an especially panoramic scene that draws the gaze into the distance, "to the cause, or to the future." In this manner, architecture is enlisted to build "a foundation for legitimization of society's needs, justification for the difficulties of present-day existence and for the price to be paid in the future."

Justification of Israel's wars, stresses Amir, "provides legitimization of the blood that has been spilled and is liable to be spilled in the future, of the continued unreserved cooperation between the military and security establishment and the citizens of the country, and of the undisputed consensus according to which struggle is the instrument of survival of our existence in Israel." These discordant words were written before the current war.

The architectural representations of commemoration in Israel are unique in that they not only document an event or period in time, but mediate between past and present, and "give validity, in terms of place and architectural planning, to the existing myths and the dictates of society."

Amir thinks of commemoration structures as "edge structures" - an extreme example of architectural symbolism and manipulation, in which the profession is called upon to shape consciousness to specific needs. At times, architecture even exploits the viewers' lack of defense, leading him or her, through its unique devices to the seemingly essential conclusion that was outlined in advance.

Mini models of commemoration

The idea of contrasts is represented by a series of black and white reduced-scale models of the commemoration structures. The models are made of light plastic materials in contrast with the stone and concrete the structures themselves are generally constructed from.

The exhibition will also offer a catalog of articles that analyze the complexity of the commemoration phenomenon in Israel. In an article about the Palmach House museum, Jewish-British architect Timothy Brittain-Catlin writes it is "in a sense the the first significant post-Zionist building, the one that has nothing stubborn or optimistic to say about the military enterprise." An article by Dan Daor conveys the same message about memorial structures, according to which there are no heroes - all there is is the eternity of Israel, all of the country is on the front, and all of us are victims.

The Foreign and Education Ministries are jointly responsible for the Israeli pavilion at the Biennale. They have allocated $90,000 to the exhibition budget. The remaining funding was raised from private and public contributions and sponsorships. Amir was selected as the curator from among several candidates. In the final stage, the other contenders withdrew their candidacy, and Amir's proposal was selected.

The Biennale, still considered the main institutional event in the international architecture world, is accompanied by a series of events and tributes. Foremost among them are the "Golden Lion" awards, which will be bestowed on the outstanding national pavilion, the outstanding city, and outstanding urban projects. This year, the prestigious architectural prize for lifetime achievement went to the veteran British architect Richard Rogers, one of the designers of the Pompidou Centre in Paris. The prizes will be awarded on the opening day of the exhibition.


apjp petitions venice biennale over israeli exhibition

By Susannah Tarbush

A week before the opening of the 10th International Architecture Biennale in Venice, the international pressure group Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine (APJP) has sent a petition to the organizers asking them to consider withdrawing the Israeli contribution.

In its petition sent on September 2, APJP says it is “dismayed and concerned” that the Biennale, which opens on September 10 and runs until November 19, has agreed to host the Israeli contribution entitled “Life Saver: Typology of Commemoration in Israel.”

APJP says the exhibition in the Israeli pavilion, funded by the Israeli government, “totally excludes the Palestinians who are the target and real victims of the seemingly unending series of wars being memorialized. In this exhibition, Israel has the sole position of victim and victor.”

It requests the Biennale Committee to consider withdrawing the Israeli entry as being “provocative and counterproductive to the aims of the Biennale, and particularly distasteful in the context of the aftermath of an ugly and unnecessary war in neighboring Lebanon, and a continuing one-side war in Gaza.”

The 21 signatories to the petition include Palestinian, Israeli and British/Jewish architects. Among them are the eminent British architect Ted Cullinan, and the distinguished architectural critic and writer Charles Jencks.

The Israeli contribution comprises exhibits of 15 memorials built between 1949 and 2006 to commemorate Israeli military war dead or the Holocaust. The Israeli Defense Ministry provided substantial support for the exhibition.

Israel is one of 50 countries participating in the Biennale, which is regarded one of the world’s most prestigious architectural events. The only Arab country taking part is Egypt.

APJP says that whatever the committee may decide to do about the Israeli participation, it would like the organizers “to consider asking for a Palestinian contribution, highlighting the historic and ongoing displacement of the Palestinian people.”

The petition says that the “eminent Israeli architects” represented in the Israeli entry are “being used as tools of Israeli propaganda, and consequently would be deemed to be complicit in the agenda of excluding the Palestinian narrative. Significantly, the Israeli organization ‘Zochrot’, which deals with remembering the Nakba, has been omitted from this exhibition.”

APJP notes there are no memorials in Israel to the Nakba, the Palestinian tragedy of displacement and dispossession, in which “the intention of transfer and exclusion led to the destruction and elimination of 580 Palestinian villages, towns and cities.”

It adds: “Even today, this dispossession and humiliation goes on in Gaza and the West Bank, with the destruction of their heritage in the historic cities of Jerusalem, Nablus, Hebron, Bethlehem and Jericho. This is particularly ironic when the subject of the Biennale is the celebration of cities.” (The title of the Biennale is ‘Cities, Architecture and Society.’)

The military memorials exhibited in the Israeli pavilion include the Ammunition Hill Memorial for the Six Day War, the Negev Brigade Memorial, the Nitzanim Memorial building, the Palmach History Museum, Bet Yad Labanim, the memorial for soldiers from Tel Aviv University, and the National Memorial in Honor of the Fallen of Israel’s Intelligence Community.

Among the Holocaust-related memorials are the Holocaust Museum and the Hall of Remembrance of Yad Vashem, Yad LaYeled Children’s Museum, and the Ghetto Fighters’ House.

The curator of the Israeli exhibition, Tula Amir, writes in the exhibition catalogue: “The justification of Israel’s wars legitimates the loss of life in the past and its possible loss in the future; the continuation of unconditional cooperation between the country’s military and defense establishment and its individual citizens; and an unequivocal understanding that this struggle is the only means for Israel’s survival.”

But commenting on Amir’s statement, APJP says: “It has been evident that the wars and tragedies engulfing Palestine/Israel since 1948 have been due to Israel’s intransigence and refusal to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the conflict.”

Amir does briefly mention the omission of the Palestinian narrative when she writes: "It is important to note, at this point, that this exhibition focuses upon this phenomenon as it is expressed in Israel's Jewish sector, which comprises approximately eighty per cent of the country's population. The approach to remembrance and commemoration within Israel's Arab-Palestinian minority represents a completely different narrative, which is given almost no architectural expression in Israel."

Amir fails to point out that while there are over a thousand memorials in Israel, no such expression is permitted to the Palestinians. Zochrot is the only Israeli organization that attempts this, by erecting signs of destroyed Palestinian villages, which are immediately taken down by the authorities.

APJP was founded in February 2006 as an independent international pressure group of design professionals who seek international support for an ethical and just practice for their professions in Palestine and the Occupied Territories.

Its website states: "We hold all design and construction professionals involved in projects that appropriate land and natural resources from Palestinian territory to be complicit in social, political and economic oppression, and to be in violation of their professional ethics."

APJP seeks to raise awareness within the planning, design and construction industries of how these professionals "are central to the occupation of Palestinian land and to the erosion of human rights." It acts as a channel to disseminate news and information relating to the built and natural environment in Israel/Palestine, "in particular highlighting ways in which planning, architecture and other construction disciplines are being used to promote an apartheid system of environmental control."

The group forges links with Israeli and Palestinian professionals and other solidarity groups "committed to non-violent resistance to the Occupation and to the establishment of a just and lasting peace."

APJP calls on Israeli and international architects, planners and those in the construction industry to express their concern in each and every instance of unjust action in annexing Palestinian land, and the projects to be built on them. "The future security and justice, in both Israel and Palestine, are at stake."

________________________________
Content is copyright respective authors.
x

Free Hit Counters

Free Web Counter - this topic only